Website QC reviews the code and the rendered output of AI-generated websites, finds the specific defects the generator tends to leave behind, and proposes small patches a real developer would actually approve.
Tailwind classes built dynamically at runtime that the JIT compiler never generates, so the style silently never applies.
Images and scripts hot-linked from unrelated or abandoned repositories, one deletion away from breaking your live site.
Two buttons labeled differently that quietly route to the exact same handler, or a state, that isn't what either label promises.
Pages missing a footer or section the rest of the codebase already expects, left out by an incomplete generation pass.
Leftover files from an earlier generation attempt that silently win module resolution over the version actually meant to ship.
A broken image with no fallback, showing the browser's default broken-icon instead of something controlled.
Think closer to a specialized linter with visual awareness than an autonomous designer.
Every proposed patch has a concrete, inspectable root cause and a reproducible symptom. Spacing, color, and layout preference are lower confidence calls and aren't patched automatically. The goal isn't the most changes, it's the highest percentage of changes a skeptical repo owner would actually merge.